![]() In the alternative, the respondent contended that there had been a consensual variation of the claimant's contract.Ģ. ![]() ![]() The respondent contended that, although the claimant was not a secondee, he was employed on a temporary basis in the form of a fixed-term contract with extensions, but not so as to be employed under the Regulations as he has a permanent full-time post to revert to once the temporary contractual arrangement ends. The claimant sought a declaration from the tribunal that he was an employee of the respondent employed under the provisions of the Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2002 ( the Regulations ) and that he was a permanent employee in the post of Implementation Officer with the respondent. The respondent was represented by Ms Finnegan, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by the Chief Legal Advisor of the Education and Library Board Solicitors.ġ. The claimant was represented by Ms A Millar, Deputy General Secretary, of NIPSA. The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the claimant is a fixed-term employee and it makes a declaration declaring him to be a permanent employee. RESPONDENT: Belfast Education and Library Board ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |